RICHARDS, U.J.:—The Dexter Construction Company, Limited, is a company incorporated under the laws of the province of New Brunswick. Its head office is at Fairville in the county of the city and county of Saint John. It is engaged in highway construction

R. T. GRAHAM, D.J.:—This is an appeal by (Mrs.) Phyllis Bouck from her assessment for income tax for the year 1944.

EGBERT, J.:—The executors and trustees of the will of Frank Robertson Webster, deceased, apply under The Trustees Act, R.S.A. 1942, ch. 215, for the advice and discretion of the court on the following questions :

AYLEWORTH, J.A.:—This is an appeal by the plaintiff Bulova Watch Company Limited from a judgment pronounced by the Chief Justice of the High Court on the 15th May, 1950, dismissing the plaintiff’s action without costs: Gruen Watch Company of

GORDON, J.A.:—This is an appeal from the judgment of Davis, J., in which he. ordered an accounting in the estate of Mary Ann Richardson, deceased, and made certain findings of fraud against her.

MCPHERSON, C.J.M.: This is an appeal from the judgment of Williams, C.J.K.B., on October 10, 1950, in favour of the respondent, which had sued for a declaration that certain moneys paid to it by the government of Canada, under The Emergency

RINFRET C.J.C.:—The Province of Saskatchewan was established in 1905 by Statutes of Canada, 4-5 Edw. VII, ec. 42.

CAMERON, J.:—This is an information in which the plaintiff claims from the defendant payment of the sum of $265,196.92 for sales tax in respect of sales of salted peanuts and cashew nuts in the period May 19, 1948, to September 30, 1949, penalties

CAMERON, J.:—This is an appeal from an assessment to income tax for the taxation year 1945. The only matter in dispute is whether the sum of $824.35 received in that year by the appellant under certain Letters Patent of the Dominion of Canada, dated

THE CHIEF JUSTICE :—It is unnecessary to recite the facts in this appeal. They are fully stated in the judgment of the learned President of the Exchequer Court and at Bar counsel for the appellant declared that he accepted them as stated in that