Muir Cap & Regalia Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, 91 DTC 533, [1991] 1 CTC 2342 (TCC) -- text

Mogan, T.C.J.:—The issue in this appeal is whether certain interest derived from term deposits during the appellant's 1983 and 1984 taxation years was income from an active business as claimed by the appellant or income from property as claimed by the

Beverly Dorcas v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 1 CTC 2312, 91 DTC 350 -- text

Kempo, T.C.J.:—This appeal concerns the appellant's 1983 taxation year wherein the respondent reassessed the appellant by adding to her income the amount of $37,382.75 pursuant to subsections 15(2) and 15(2.1) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148

Wilfred L. Giffin and Fundy Construction Company Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 1 CTC 2306, 91 DTC 421 -- text

Margeson, T.C.J. [Orally]:—These two cases were heard on common evidence by the consent of the parties. They involve reassessments by the Minister of the income of the appellants for the 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985 taxation years. By notices of reassessment dated January

Deborah Mastronardi v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 1 CTC 2302, 91 DTC 341 -- text

Rip, T.C.J.:—The Minister of National Revenue, the respondent, by notice dated July 27, 1988 and bearing Number 554264, assessed Deborah Mastronardi, the appellant, the sum of $12,683.88 pursuant to subsections 160(1) and (2) of the Income Tax Act,

Leonard Reeves Incorporated v. Minister of National Revenue, 91 DTC 425, [1991] 1 CTC 2293 (TCC) -- text

Sarchuk, T.C.J.:—The appeals of Leonard Reeves Incorporated are from assessments to income tax for the 1984 and 1985 taxation years and from a notice of determination of loss for the 1983 taxation year. The principal issue is whether the profit arising

Winston W. Penny v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 1 CTC 2288, 91 DTC 307 -- text

Taylor, T.C.J.:—These are appeals heard in Toronto, Ontario, on November 7, 1990, against income tax assessments for the years 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983. At the time of the trial, there remained only two items in dispute—an amount included in the appellants

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS