Badshah B. Husain v. Minister of National Revenue, 91 DTC 278, [1991] 1 CTC 2266 (TCC) -- text

Sarchuk, T.C.J.:—The appeal of Badshah B. Husain (Husain) is from an assessment in respect of her 1984 taxation year. This assessment was made on the basis that Husain received interest in the amount of $26,650 during the year which was not

Seaway-Levy Technical & Financial Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 1 CTC 2260, 91 DTC 323 -- text

Sarchuk, T.C.J.:—The appeals of Seaway-Levy Technical & Financial Ltd. (Seaway) are from reassessments of tax with respect to its 1981, 1982 and 1983 taxation years. The issue before me arises in the following manner.

Tor-Guelph Holdings Limited v. Minister of National Revenue and 309901 Ontario Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, 91 DTC 355, [1991] 1 CTC 2252 (TCC) -- text

Brulé, T.C.J.:—Two issues are involved in this appeal by the appellants respecting their 1982 taxation years. The first is whether losses realized by the appellants are business losses or allowable business investment losses. The second is whether interest expenses

Temax Investments Inc. and Mayon Investments Inc. v. Minister of National Revenue, 91 DTC 364, [1991] 1 CTC 2245 (TCC) -- text

Brulé, T.C.J.:—These appeals were heard on common evidence and concern the taxation years 1984, 1985 and 1987 for Mayon Investments Inc. (Mayon") and 1984 and 1985 for Temax Investments Inc. CTemax"). Both companies were reassessed by Revenue Canada treating

Richard Street v. Minister of National Revenue, 91 DTC 369, [1991] 1 CTC 2240 (TCC) -- text

Christie, A.C.J.T.C.:—This appeal relates to the appellant's 1987 taxation year. At the times relevant to this appeal he was employed by SHL Systemhouse Inc. "Systemhouse"). In his return of income for that year he deducted $18,460 as an allowable capital

Xavier V. Fernandez v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 1 CTC 2211, 91 DTC 182 -- text

Mogan, T.C.J.:—At the conclusion of the hearing of this appeal at Ottawa on October 9, 1990, I delivered oral reasons for judgment which, in substance, dismissed the appeal. I have reconsidered my position on one of the matters in dispute and, in

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS