Gao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 490 -- text
Netupsky v. R., [1996] 2 CTC 29, 96 DTC 6129 -- text
Marceau J.A.: — We are all of the view that this appeal cannot succeed.
We think that the learned Tax Court judge dealt properly with the issues raised and we substantially agree with her reasons.
Del Zotto v. Canada, [1996] 2 CTC 22, 96 DTC 6222 -- text
Stone J.A. (Linden, McDonald, JJ.A., concurring): — This appeal is from an order of the Trial Division of October 12, 1995, which partially lifted a stay order of that Court dated November 26, 1993. As it was heard
Walls v. The Queen, 96 DTC 6142, [1996] 2 CTC 14 (FCTD), rev'd 2002 SCC 47 -- text
Pinard J.T.C.C.: — These appeals are brought pursuant to subsection 172(2) of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”). The plaintiffs were reassessed by the Minister of National Revenue (the “Minister”) with respect to their 1984 and
Munich Reinsurance Co. v. The Queen, 96 DTC 6185, [1996] 2 CTC 5 (FCTD) -- text
Richard J.: — This is an appeal pursuant to subsection 175(1) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.) (the “Act”), and section 48 of the Federal Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7, from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada dated August 9, 1991, [1992] 1 C.T.C. 2004, 91 D.T.C. 1137 (T.C.C.) which dismissed appeals of two reassessments issued by the Minister of National Revenue (the Minister) on June 8, 1989, and confirmed on March 28, 1990.
The Queen v. Kalef, 96 DTC 6132, [1996] 2 CTC 1 (FCA) -- text
McDonald J.A.: — This is an appeal from a judgment of the Tax Court of Canada dated December 14, 1994 which allowed the Respondent’s appeal and vacated the assessments made against him. As the appeal was heard with the appeal in Court
Canada (Attorney General) v. Robinson, 2021 FCA 39 -- text
Friedman v. Canada (National Revenue), 2021 FCA 101 -- text
TEKSAVVY SOLUTIONS INC. v. BELL MEDIA INC. ET AL., 2021 FCA 100 -- text
Pages
