James N. Knox v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1994] 2 CTC 2125 -- text

Sobier, J.T.C.C.:—The appellant appeals from the assessment by the Minister of National Revenue (the "Minister") with respect to his 1992 taxation year, whereby the Minister included in his income amounts received by him in that year pursuant to a long-term

Raymond Binks v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1994] 2 CTC 2105 -- text

Christie, A.C.J.T.C. (orally):—The years under appeal are 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991. The issue is whether in computing his income for those years the appellant is entitled to deduct his full farming losses. In reassessing the appellant's liability to income

Albert Surminsky v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1994] 2 CTC 2098 (Informal Procedure) -- text

Bell, J.T.C.C.:— The issue in this appeal, heard under the informal procedure of the Court, is whether a penalty levied by the Minister of National Revenue ("Minister") pursuant to the provisions of subsection 162(2) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am. S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63) (the "Act"), in respect of each of the appellant’s 1989 and 1990 taxation years was properly levied.

Gerard W.A. Richard v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1994] 2 CTC 2096 -- text

O'Connor, J.T.C.C.:— This appeal was heard in Ottawa, Ontario on April 15, 1994 pursuant to the informal procedure of this Court. The only issue in this case is whether in his 1991 taxation year the appellant is entitled to deduct room and

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS