Mahoney, J.A.:—This application for judicial review and a parallel one by the applicant's wife, file A-984-92, are concerned with appeals against their 1986 and 1987 income tax assessments dealt with together by the Tax Court of Canada under its informal

Rothstein, J.:—This case comes to this Court by way of appeal from the Tax Court of Canada. By decision dated May 19, 1992, Sarchuk, J.T.C.C. found in favour of the defendant and the plaintiff appeals that decision.

Pinard, J.:—By her application for judicial review the applicant is seeking to set aside a decision made on October 16, 1992 by Kal Malhotra, Chief of Appeals, Revenue Canada, in order to vacate in part only, and not entirely, the interest on

Isaac, C.J.:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division, pronounced February 20,1992, dismissing the appellant's appeal from a judgment of the Tax Court which had upheld assessments by the respondent Minister of income taxes and interest payable

Cullen, J.:—This motion, made pursuant to Rule 324, is for an extension of time to file a statement of claim in order to appeal from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada (Hagedorn v. Canada, [1993] 2 C.T.C. 3141. The

Rouleau, J.:—The plaintiffs Can-Am Realty Ltd. and Edward Podavin appeal from reassessments by the Minister of National Revenue with respect to their 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 taxation years. The Minister claims the plaintiff Can- Am Realty failed to report

Heald J.A. (Linden and Gray, JJ.A., concurring):—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division [Scott v. Canada, [1991] 1 C.T.C. 395, 91 D.T.C. 5268] wherein the appellant’s action to set aside the

Joyal, J.:—This is an appeal by way of a statement of claim from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada dated June 3, 1985, dismissing the plaintiff's appeal from a tax reassessment pertaining to the 1976 and 1977 taxation years of the plaintiff.

Giles, A.S.P.:—There are before me two motions. The first in time was filed by the Crown seeking an order requiring the plaintiffs to resubmit to an examination for discovery to answer questions refused and to pay the cost of reattendance. The

Robertson, J.A. (Isaac, C.J., Létourneau, J.A. concurring):—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division which dismissed the appellant’s appeal from a reassessment of income tax in connection with Sidney Greenwood's 1979 terminal