Colin McPhail v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as Represented by the Minister of National Revenue, [1994] 1 CTC 259, 94 DTC 6198 -- text

Muldoon, J.:—The “plaintiff” herein has no solicitor of record, and no barrister or other counsel appeared with or for him at the hearing of this matter. That may account for the designations in the style of cause of "plaintiff" and "defendant" and

Water's Edge Village Estates (Phase II) Ltd. v. The Queen, 94 DTC 6284, [1994] 1 CTC 258 (FCTD) -- text

Dube, J.:—This application for judicial review under section 18.1 of the Federal Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7, is for an order directing the Minister of National Revenue to allow the applicant taxpayer to carryforward his construction costs

Cancor Software Corp. (Formerly Cancor Computer Corp.), Cancor Research, Inc. And Thomas A. Corr v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1994] 1 CTC 237, 94 DTC 6102 -- text

Arbour, Abella and Austin, JJ.A. (orally):— The central argument advanced on behalf of the appellants before this Court is that the trial iudge misapprehended the evidence with respect to the true nature of the arrangements between IBS (US)

City Centre Properties Inc. (Successor in Name to Royalty Mall Limited) v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1994] 1 CTC 221, 94 DTC 6209 -- text

MacKay, J.:— This is an action for declaratory relief, sought in one or more forms, the effect of which would be to declare that the plaintiff is not liable for payment of income taxes and interest arising from reassessments, made in 1983 b the

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS