Supermarché Dubuc & Frère Inc. v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1994] 1 CTC 2215 (Informal Procedure) -- text

Garon, J.T.C.C.:—This is an appeal under the informal procedure from an assessment of the Minister of National Revenue dated August 9, 1991 for the appellant’s 1988 taxation year. By that assessment the Minister of National Revenue included in the appellant’s income $75,000 received from Métro- Richelieu Inc. ("Métro"), whereas the appellant had considered that the amount was the proceeds of disposition of eligible capital property and as such had included the sum of $36,560 in its income.

Gerardus Van Halderen and Elizabeth Van Halderen v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1994] 1 CTC 2187, 94 DTC 1027 -- text

Christie, A.C.J.T.C.C.:—The year under review is 1987. These appeals were heard together on common evidence. The appellants are husband and wife. The core issue is the appellants’ liability to income tax on amounts realized by them related to the disposition

Frank R. Mott-Trille v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1994] 1 CTC 2159, 94 DTC 1013 -- text

O’Connor, J.T.C.C.:—These appeals were heard in Ottawa, Ontario on October 19, 20 and 21, 1993 pursuant to the general procedure of this Court and relate to the appellant's 1986, 1987, 1988 and 1989 taxation years. In assessing, the Minister of National

Ikea Ltd. v. The Queen, 94 DTC 1112, [1994] 1 CTC 2140 (TCC), aff'd 96 DTC 6526 (FCA), aff'd 98 DTC 6092 (SCC) -- text

Bowman, J.T.C.C.:—This appeal, from an assessment for the appellant’s 1986 taxation year, raises once again the question of the treatment under the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am. S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63) (the "Act"), prior to the coming

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS