Fenwick, J. (orally):—Now is the time set for the decision in the Charter application. I’m prepared to deliver that decision now, and I'll do that.

The accused, Stanley George Agopsowicz, stands charged that he:

Feldman, J. (orally):—Mr. Griffin pleaded guilty to tax evasion by preparing false tax returns for 97 customers over three taxation years. One hundred and fifty- five false returns were prepared, including false claims totalling over $1,000,000. Under the

Hunt, J.:—This case concerns a question of priorities between Revenue Canada and the Alberta Treasury Branch (hereinafter referred to as "ATB"), as regards moneys known as the Pigott Fund which have been paid into Court.

Isaac, C.J. (McDonald concurring):—This section 28 application seeks to review and set aside the decision of a judge of the Tax Court in which it was held that the sum of $14,249.92 which the applicant had received in the taxation year

MacGuigan, J.A. (orally):—We do not need to hear you, Ms. Brown.

Strayer, J.:— This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada dated February 5, 1990, in which that Court dismissed the appeal of the plaintiff with respect to the Minister's reassessment of the plaintiff's 1984 taxation year. In

Isaac, C.J (Robertson and McDonald, JJ.A., concurring): —This section 28 application seeks to review and set aside a decision of the Tax Court which dismissed the applicant's appeal from the reassessment of his income tax return

Cullen, J.:— The plaintiff, Cumberland Ready Mix Ltd., appeals to this Court from notices of reassessment by the Minister of National Revenue (the Minister), dated July 3, 1987, in respect of the plaintiff’s 1983, 1984, 1985 and 1986 taxation years. The

Rouleau, J.:—A preliminary matter was raised by counsel for the plaintiff, regarding burden of proof and the order in which evidence is to be adduced at trial. I ruled that the Minister of National Revenue’s (the Minister) burden of proof with

Archambault J. (orally):— I think the issue of whether or not to order particulars really becomes a balancing act in the final analysis. On the one hand, in accordance with section 587, the Court may, if it is satisfied that it is necessary