Bowman, J.T.C.C.:—This appeal, from an assessment for the appellant’s 1985 taxation year has to do, if I understand the appellant's position correctly, with the assessment of interest.

Sarchuk, J.T.C.C.:—Appeals from assessments of income tax with respect to Ronald Bruhm's 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985 taxation years were scheduled to be heard on January 19, 1993. On January 18, 1993 counsel for both parties appeared before me and advised

Beaubier, J.T.C.C. (orally):—This matter was heard in Vancouver, British Columbia on the February 4, 1994 pursuant to the informal procedure of this Court. The appellant was the only witness.

Kempo, J.T.C.C.:—These appeals concern the appellant's 1986, 1987 and 1988 taxation years.

Mogan, J.T.C.C.:—There are two issues in this appeal. The first is whether the appellant may report in ten equal annual instalments over the years 1984 to 1993 a large amount received in 1984. The second issue involves alternative claims for a

Kempo, J.T.C.C. (orally):—These informal procedure appeals concern the 1989 and 1990 taxation years of Gloria Lindstrom.

Paragraphs 2-5 of her notice of appeal dated September 9, 1993 raised the following matters:

Bowman, J.T.C.C.:— Mr. Hadi Sarraf appeals from assessments for 1980 and 1981 and his wife, Mrs. Ozra Sarraf, appeals from two assessments made on April 6, 1989 under section 160 of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am.

Brulé, J.T.C.C.:— These appeals involve the 1985, 1986 and 1987 taxation years of the appellant. The Minister of National Revenue ("Minister") allowed arming losses to the restricted amounts set out in subsection 31(1) of the Income Tax Act,

Beaubier, J.T.C.C. (orally):— This matter was heard in Vancouver, B.C., on February 4 and 8, 1994, pursuant to the informal procedure of this Court. The appellant’s wife, Ann-Marie Kachmar, testified on his behalf. Evelyn Koffeman, senior agent, Client

Margeson, J.T.C.C.:— This matter was heard under the informal procedure and the decision is given thereunder.