Jerome, A.C.J.:—In this action, the plaintiff appeals from two reassessments dated July 5, 1978 issued by the defendant in respect of the plaintiff's 1974 and 1975 taxation years.
Teitelbaum, J.:—The plaintiff, Rivermede Developments Ltd., appeals, by way of a trial de novo, from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada dismissing its appeal from a reassessment made by the Minister of National Revenue for the 1977 taxation year
Décary, J.A.:—This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Tax Court of Canada dismissing the appellant’s motion for leave to amend her amended reply to the notice of appeal for a fourth time. The motion was made on the fifth day
Strayer, J.:—
Rothstein, J.:—
Mahoney, J.A.:—This is an application for judicial review of an unreported decision of the Tax Court of Canada, ensuing upon an informal hearing (file no. 91-1006, King, D.J., November 6, 1991). It dismissed the applicant's appeal from an assessment of
Rothstein, J. (orally):—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada dismissing the plaintiff's claim for want of prosecution. However, the appeal in this court is treated as a trial de novo and the court has
Pinard, J.:—This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a decision by the Tax Court of Canada which upheld notices of reassessments from the Minister of National Revenue denying the plaintiff taxpayer the right to deduct farming losses amounting to
Létourneau, J.A.:—This is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Tax Court of Canada dismissing the taxpayer's appeal, thereby upholding the notice of assessment issued by the Minister of National Revenue.
Rothstein, J.:—
