Orest Porayko, Andrew F. Butt, Frank T. Leslie, John David Shillington, Elizabeth A. Bannister, Bruce Patrick, Margaret Morgan and A. Lindsay Laxton v. Minister of National Revenue, [1993] 2 CTC 3098, 93 DTC 1430 -- text

Rowe, D.T.C.C.J.:— On February 10, 1993, the Honourable Judge Hamlyn of the Tax Court of Canada ordered that this appeal be heard in part by way of common evidence with the appeals of Andrew F. Butt (88-1837), John David Shillington (88-1842),

Bohdan Barabash and Wolodymyr Barabash v. Minister of National Revenue, [1993] 2 CTC 3080, 93 DTC 1436 -- text

Margeson, T.C.C.J. (orally):— The matters before me today for decision are those of Bohdan Barabash v. M.N.R., 90-2071 and Wolodymyr Barabash v. M.N.R., 90-2995. It was agreed at the outset that the

Mackintosh Flexo-Gravure Limited and Jane Mackintosh v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1993] 2 CTC 3076, 94 DTC 1225 -- text

Sobier, T.C.C.J. (orally):— The appellant Mackintosh Flexo-Gravure Ltd. (” Flexo") appeals from the assessment of the Minister of National Revenue (the "Minister") for the 1987 taxation year whereby the Minister disallowed the small business deduction under subsection

Rita Bettencourt and Francisco Bettencourt v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1993] 2 CTC 3070 -- text

Mogan, T.C.C.J. (orally):— The appeals of Francisco Bettencourt and his wife Rita Bettencourt were heard together on common evidence. The taxation years under appeal are 1986, 1987 and 1988. During those years, the appellants were the principal

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS