Gregory v. MNR, 92 DTC 6518, [1992] 2 CTC 250 (FCTD) -- text
Teitelbaum, J.:—By means of an originating motion, the applicant, John Norman Gregory, a partner in the firm of Thorsteinssons, Barristers & Solicitors, requests:
Teitelbaum, J.:—By means of an originating motion, the applicant, John Norman Gregory, a partner in the firm of Thorsteinssons, Barristers & Solicitors, requests:
Rouleau, J.:—This appeal, by way of trial de novo, is concerned with reassessments of income tax for the plaintiff's 1976 and 1977 taxation years. In filing his returns, the plaintiff computed his income on the basis that he was
Reed, J.:—This is an appeal by way of trial de novo from a decision of the Tax Court dated September 9, 1987. That decision upheld the Minister of National Revenue's assessment of the income tax payable by the plaintiff for
McGillis, J.:—The appellant Jocelyn Ghent Mallett appeals from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada dismissing her appeal concerning the deductibility of moving expenses claimed by her in the 1985 taxation year.
Hugessen, J.A.:—While it is trite law that a taxpayer may so arrange his business as to attract the least possible tax (see Duke of Westminster's case, [1936] A.C. 1), it is equally clear in our view that the reduction of his own tax
MacKay, J.:—In this action the plaintiff appeals from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada (United Equities Ltd. v. M.N.R., [1989] 2 C.T.C. 2171, 89 D.T.C. 391 (T.C.C.)), pursuant to section 172 of the Income
Reed, J.:—The issue raised in the present proceeding concerns the interpretation of a waiver signed by the plaintiff pursuant to subparagraph 152(4)(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am. S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63) (the
Joyal, J.:—This is an appeal by the Crown by way of a trial de novo from a judgment of the Tax Court of Canada delivered on April 14, 1986.
Giles, A.S.P.:— When this motion came on before me, Mr. Klotz responding, indicated that he had been retained only to present argument with respect to the alleged inadequacies of the authorization for Olympia Interiors Ltd. to commence the action. I indicated that Mr.
MacKay, J.:—This action is an appeal from an income tax reassessment by the Minister of National Revenue of the plaintiff's return of income for its 1980 taxation year. A statement of claim was filed December 30, 1985 (and subsequently amended December 12, 1986),