James E. Clark v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 2 CTC 2507, 91 DTC 1460 -- text

Dubienski, D.T.CJ.:— The appellant is the president of a conglomerate of companies under the corporate name of Jecco Group (hereinafter referred to as "Jecco"). This group carried on many businesses, including real estate developments and the assisting of financing

Gordon Jackman v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 2 CTC 2506, 91 DTC 1275 -- text

Taylor. T.CJ.:—This is an appeal heard in Edmonton, Alberta, on July 29, 1991, against an income tax assessment for the year 1988. The point at issue is the disallowance by the Minister of National Revenue ("respondent") of a claim by the taxpayer

Joseph J. Huzan v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 2 CTC 2491, 91 DTC 1257 -- text

Kempo, T.CJ.:—These appeals involve the taxation years of 1984 and 1985 wherein the appellant disputed the respondent's reassessments involving the characterization of his dispositions of securities as being on income account. The appellant's pleaded position was that

Mercerie Manic Inc. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 2 CTC 2488, 92 DTC 1116 -- text

Tremblay, T.CJ.:—This appeal was heard on common evidence with the appeal of Albert Cloutier (86-1583(IT)) in Quebec City, Quebec, on December 6, 1988. The arguments were heard on January 5 and 6, 1989, in Quebec City, and the case was taken under

Albert Cloutier v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 2 CTC 2469, 91 DTC 246 -- text

Tremblay, T.CJ.:—This appeal was heard on common evidence with the appeal of Mercerie Manic Inc. (86-1580(IT) in Quebec City, Quebec, on December 6, 1988. The arguments were heard on January 5 and 6, 1989, in Quebec City, and the case was taken

Oscar J. Forward v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 2 CTC 2454, 91 DTC 1255 -- text

Rip, T.C.J.:—Oscar Forward, the appellant, has appealed from an assessment of income tax for 1985 by which the Minister of National Revenue ("Minister") disallowed his claim for a deduction in computing his taxable income in accordance with paragraph 109(1)(b)

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS