Tricolor Prolab Ltd. (Formerly Tricolor Prolab (1979) Ltd.) v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1990] 2 CTC 370 -- text

Teitelbaum, J.:—The plaintiff, Tricolor Prolab Ltd., formerly known as Tricolor Prolab (1979) Ltd., is appealing, by means of a direct action, the assessment issued by the Minister of National Revenue dated February 6, 1987 requiring the payment of $26,924.39

Lloyds Bank Canada v. International Warranty Company Limited and Attorney General of Canada v. International Warranty Company Limited, [1990] 2 CTC 360 -- text

Stratton, J.A.: — The issue in these two appeals involves the determination of entitlement to certain funds wherein Revenue Canada is the competing creditor in the first named action against the appellant, Lloyds Bank Canada ("Lloyds") and in the

Lloyds Bank Canada v. International Warranty Company Limited and Attorney General of Canada v. International Warranty Company Limited, [1990] 2 CTC 357 -- text

McDonald, J.:—In my previous reasons for judgment dated January 19, 1989, ([1989] 1 C.T.C. 401; 89 D.T.C. 5279) I held that, under subsection 224(1.2) and (1.3) of the Income Tax Act, Revenue Canada's claim overrides the existing

Alfredo Zeppetelli and Carmelina Morelli and Ebenisterie Alfredo (1986) Inc. And Gestion Alfredo (1986) Inc. And Marc Gregoire, C.A. v. Her Majesty the Queen and the Attorney General of Canada and the Honourable Otto Jelinek, [1990] 2 CTC 354, 90 DTC 6461 -- text

Baudouin, J.: —

Roseland Farms Ltd. v. The Queen, 90 DTC 6512, [1990] 2 CTC 348 (FCTD) -- text

Muldoon, J.:—This is the defendant's application to compel answers and compliance with undertakings on discovery, as well as production of documents, pursuant to Rules 455(18) and 455(2). The individual being questioned to provide answers for the plaintiff has been

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS