Mahoney, J.A.:—These appeals are from identical orders made by the Associate Chief Justice on applications of the respondent taxpayers, who claimed refunds of taxes they had not paid under Part VIII of the Income Tax Act. The reasons

MacKay, J.:—The plaintiffs, Gary C. Graves and Mary J. Graves, appeal pursuant to subsection 172(1) of the Income Tax Act, S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63, as amended, from the decision of the Tax Court of Canada rendered August 29,

MacKay, J.:—This case, heard in Saskatoon, concerns the deduction of restricted farm losses as provided for in subsection 31(1) of the Income Tax Act, S.C. 1970-71-72, c.63, as amended.

Mahoney, J.A.: —With respect, the present facts simply do not support the appellant’s submissions that this is something of a landmark case. It is not. Our judgment cannot affect anyone except the parties and perhaps the other taxpayers who, it

Martin, J.:—The plaintiff is a farmer who now resides in the City of Saskatoon. Not only was the plaintiff a farmer but he was also a successful one who had, by 1980, accumulated substantial savings, property and credit. In that year he

Collver, J.:—This is an application by the respondents occasioned by an administrative error by a Collections Investigations Officer. The respondents seek relief from their failure to make a timely reply to the appellant’s notice of appeal against a substantial

Mahoney, J.A. (Hugessen and MacGuigan, JJ.A. concurring):—This appeal from a reported judgment of the Trial Division, [1987] 1 C.T.C. 329; 87 D.T.C. 5223, was heard together with the appeal, H.M. v. Moore, Court file A-2268-84. I have not been

Addy, J.:—These are appeals by the Minister of National Revenue from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada allowing an appeal by the taxpayers from the Minister’s assessment which disallowed restrictive farm losses of $5,000 for farming operations of the

Mahoney, J.A. (Hugessen and MacGuigan, JJ.A. concurring):—This appeal from a reported decision of the Trial Division, [1988] 2 C.T.C. 279; 88 D.T.C. 6483, was argued consecutively with the appeal of Denis Verrier, Court file A-1040-88, as the cases had been

Mahoney, J.A. (Hugessen and MacGuigan, JJ.A. concurring):—This is an appeal from a reported decision of the Trial Division, [1988] 2 C.T.C. 274; 88 D.T.C. 6478, which upheld the assessment of the appellant's 1979 and 1980 income tax returns on the basis