Kurt Pieckenhagen and Julita Pieckenhagen and Julita Investments Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1990] 1 CTC 2075, 89 DTC 725 -- text

Brule, T.C.J.:—There are three appellants before this Court. The first two are Mr. Kurt Pieckenhagen and his wife, Mrs. Julita Pieckenhagen. They are appealing reassessments for the 1977 taxation year. The third is Julita Investments Ltd. ("the Corporation") which

Cassidy's Limited (Formerly Packer Floor Coverings Ltd.) v. Minister of National Revenue, [1990] 1 CTC 2043 -- text

Rip, T.C.J.: —During the years 1980 to 1984 Packer Floor Coverings Ltd. ("Packer"), [1] at the time a wholly owned subsidiary of the appellant, incurred losses as a result of frauds committed by its vice-president. In computing its

Donald G. Mackay and Keith F. Eaman v. Minister of National Revenue, [1990] 1 CTC 2036, 89 DTC 515 -- text

St. Onge, T.C.J.:—The appeals of Donald G. MacKay and Keith Eaman were heard on common evidence on May 26, 1989, in the City of Ottawa, Ontario, and the issue is whether the appellants are allowed to deduct capital cost allowance in

Estate of Bernard Zylstra and Robert E. Vandervennen v. Minister of National Revenue, [1990] 1 CTC 2035, 89 DTC 657 -- text

Goetz, T.C.J.: —The appeals of the estate of the late Bernard Zylstra, file no. 87-311(IT) and of Robert E. Vandervennen, file no. 88-314(IT) were heard on common evidence. They relate to income tax assessments for their 1985 taxation year.

Treefield Holdings Limited, Burning Elm Holdings Limited and Bay Leaf Holdings Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1990] 1 CTC 2023, 89 DTC 694 -- text

Sarchuk, T.C.J.: — Bay Leaf Holdings Inc., Burning Elm Holdings Ltd. and Treefield Holdings Ltd. appeal from reassessments made by the Minister of National Revenue in respect of the 1982 taxation year. By consent of all parties the appeals were

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS