Rudolf Merkle and Rosemarie Merkle v. Minister of National Revenue, [1990] 1 CTC 2090, 89 DTC 730 -- text

Taylor, T.C.J.:—These are appeals heard on common evidence in Calgary, Alberta on October 24, 1989, against income tax assessments for the year 1987 in which the Minister of National Revenue recalculated the reported income of the taxpayers with reference to

Kurt Pieckenhagen and Julita Pieckenhagen and Julita Investments Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1990] 1 CTC 2075, 89 DTC 725 -- text

Brule, T.C.J.:—There are three appellants before this Court. The first two are Mr. Kurt Pieckenhagen and his wife, Mrs. Julita Pieckenhagen. They are appealing reassessments for the 1977 taxation year. The third is Julita Investments Ltd. ("the Corporation") which

Cassidy's Limited (Formerly Packer Floor Coverings Ltd.) v. Minister of National Revenue, [1990] 1 CTC 2043 -- text

Rip, T.C.J.: —During the years 1980 to 1984 Packer Floor Coverings Ltd. ("Packer"), [1] at the time a wholly owned subsidiary of the appellant, incurred losses as a result of frauds committed by its vice-president. In computing its

Donald G. Mackay and Keith F. Eaman v. Minister of National Revenue, [1990] 1 CTC 2036, 89 DTC 515 -- text

St. Onge, T.C.J.:—The appeals of Donald G. MacKay and Keith Eaman were heard on common evidence on May 26, 1989, in the City of Ottawa, Ontario, and the issue is whether the appellants are allowed to deduct capital cost allowance in

Estate of Bernard Zylstra and Robert E. Vandervennen v. Minister of National Revenue, [1990] 1 CTC 2035, 89 DTC 657 -- text

Goetz, T.C.J.: —The appeals of the estate of the late Bernard Zylstra, file no. 87-311(IT) and of Robert E. Vandervennen, file no. 88-314(IT) were heard on common evidence. They relate to income tax assessments for their 1985 taxation year.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS