Kahn-Tineta Horn v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 1 CTC 2208, 89 DTC 147 -- text

Lamarre Proulx, T.C.J.:—This is an appeal from the Minister of National Revenue's assessment of income tax for the appellant's 1986 taxation year. By this assessment the respondent added to the appellant's income the amount of $10,800, which the appellant

Golden Arrows Schoolbuses Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 1 CTC 2204, 89 DTC 150 -- text

Taylor, T.C.J.: —These are appeals heard in Edmonton, Alberta, on December 6, 1988, against income tax assessments in which the Minister of National Revenue disallowed investment tax credits taken by the appellant for the years 1983 and 1984. The

Willis S. McLeese v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 1 CTC 2201, 89 DTC 157 -- text

Brulé, T.C.J.:— This appeal involves the 1977, 1978, 1979 and 1980 taxation years of the appellant. In all four years the Minister disallowed rental losses claimed and subsequently this portion of the appeal was abandoned leaving the determination of a

James Stephen Bancroft v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 1 CTC 2196, 89 DTC 153 -- text

Lamarre Proulx, T.C.J.:—This is an appeal in respect of the appellant's 1982, 1983 and 1984 taxation years in which the Minister disallowed deductions in the amount of $43,390, $54,414 and $34,875 respectively, that the appellant had claimed as expenses

Barbara Joan Rodgers and 493800 Ontario Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 1 CTC 2181, 89 DTC 78 -- text

Taylor, T.C.J.:—These are appeals heard on common evidence at London, Ontario, on October 4, 1988, against assessments under subsection 160(2) of the Income Tax Act, — in the case of Barbara Rodgers, dated April 24, 1985, and

Shirley M. Driol v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 1 CTC 2175, 89 DTC 122 -- text

Rip, T.C.J.: —The appellant, Shirley Driol, appeals an income tax assessment for 1985 in which the Minister of National Revenue, the respondent, did not permit her to deduct in computing income the amount of $26,045.22 paid by her to the

J. Stollar Construction Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 1 CTC 2171 -- text

Bonner, T.C.J.: —This is an appeal from an assessment of income tax for the 1976 taxation year. The issue is whether the respondent assessed “with all due dispatch" as required by subsection 152(1) of the Income Tax Act (Act) and, if not, whether the failure to do so invalidates the assessment. That subsection read in part as follows:

in English

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS