Deputy Minister of National Revenue, Taxation v. V.V. Atchison (A.K.A. Dick Atchison) Deputy Minister of National Revenue, Taxation v. Wilma Elizabeth Atchison (A.K.A. Wilma Elizabeth Jenson), [1989] 1 CTC 342 -- text

Sheppard, J.: The respondents apply by way of notice of motion to set aside the ex parte orders of the Honourable Judge van der Hoop dated October 12, 1988. The orders sought to be set aside emanate from two separate proceedings

Oscar Kruger and Oscar H. Kruger Professional Corporation v. Rick Kubica, Henry S. Lee and Minister of National Revenue and Attorney General of Canada, [1989] 1 CTC 331 -- text

Cooke, J.:—The respondents apply to strike out the plaintiff's statement of claim under Rule 27 on the ground that this Court has no jurisdiction to hear the action and that exclusive jurisdiction resides within the Federal Court of Canada pursuant to

Ontario Development Corp. v. The Queen, 89 DTC 5134, [1989] 1 CTC 319 (FCTD) -- text

Cullen, J.:—The question to be determined is who, as between the plaintiff and the defendant Crown, has priority to the $19,116.61 paid by Bell Northern Research (BNR) to the Department of National Revenue pursuant to the "Requirement to Pay” issued

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS