McKinlay Transport Limited and C.T. Transport Inc. v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1988] 1 CTC 426 -- text

Grange, J.A.: — This is an appeal pursuant to leave granted by this Court, from the order of Mr. Justice Trainor on a case stated to him by Provincial Judge Langdon relating to the constitutional validity of subsection 231(3) of the

R. v. McKinlay Transport Ltd., 87 DTC 5051, [1988] 1 CTC 421 (Ont HC), aff'd 88 DTC 6314, [1988] 1 CTC 426 (Ont CA), further, aff'd 90 DTC 6243, [1990] 1 SCR 627 -- text

Trainor, J.:—This stated case is a test of the constitutional validity of subsection 231(3) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am. 1970-71-72, c. 63), as amended, when read in the light of section 8 of the

Thomas A. Corr Et Al. v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Et Al., [1988] 1 CTC 409 -- text

Steele J. [Orally]:—This is an application to cross-examine the informant Vettese on his information used to obtain a search warrant under the Income Tax Act. In an earlier appplication I granted such relief based on the Rules of

Laurentide Rendering Inc. v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1988] 1 CTC 406, 88 DTC 6133 -- text

Le juge Desjardins: —La seule question en litige est celle de déterminer si le juge de première instance a erré en droit lorsque, dans un jugement en date du 19 novembre 1982, il a décidé qu'un montant de 171 496,13 $ reçu par

The Clarkson Company Limited, as the Receiver and Manager of Aero Trades (Western) Ltd. v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1988] 1 CTC 395, 88 DTC 6256 -- text

McNair, J.: —In this case, the plaintiff sues the defendant for recovery of a balance of $50,447.33 for work done and services provided at the request of the defendant, pursuant to an air charter contract entered into between Aero Trades

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS