Jerome A.C.J.:—The plaintiff appeals the defendant's reassessment of its 1980 and 1981 taxation years. At issue is the taxpayer's deduction from its taxable income of an amount paid to the City of Edmonton in connection with the taxpayer's application for

Hugessen, J.:—The respondent (plaintiff) moves in writing, pursuant to rule 324, for special directions concerning costs, pursuant to rule 344. The Chief Justice has nominated me to hear and dispose of the motion.

Reed, J.:—The plaintiff filed a statement of claim, on February 14, 1986, appealing a decision of the Tax Court of Canada whereby the plaintiff's claim for the payment of taxes allegedly owing by the defendant was disallowed. This disposition of the

McNair, J.: —This is the taxpayer's appeal under section 172 of the Income Tax Act from the reassessment of his income in respect of the 1981 taxation year.

The Associate Chief Justice: —This action by way of appeal from a judgment of the Tax Court of Canada dated May 29, 1985, allowing the defendant's appeal in respect of his 1979 and 1980 taxation years, came on for hearing at

Martin, J.: —The plaintiff, Desrochers Development Corporation, appeals the October 11, 1983 reassessment by the Minister of National Revenue in which the gain made on a sale of property in Saskatoon was classified as income rather than as a capital

Rouleau, J.: —This is an appeal commenced by way of statement of claim from a decision of the Tax Review Board dated January 4, 1982, allowing the defendant's appeal of a notice of reassessment issued by the plaintiff on March 16,1979

Finlayson, J.A.: — This is an appeal from the judgment of the Honourable Mr. Justice Steele, sitting in Weekly Court, dated January 12, 1987, wherein he ordered Giuseppe Vettese to attend for cross-examination on affidavits sworn in support of four

Martin, J.:—The plaintiff, London Life Insurance Company, appeals the defendant's reassessment of July 28, 1980 in respect of its 1976 taxation year under which the defendant assessed the plaintiff for additional tax on the basis that the plaintiff was not

Teitelbaum, J.:—This is an application by the plaintiff, Pierre J. LeBel (LeBel) wherein the said LeBel requests an order of the Federal Court extending the time for filing of a Notice of Appeal from the Judgment of Mr. Justice Collier dated