Muldoon, ].: —This matter is brought before the Court on the application of the above named defendants Norberg and Sasnett. It concerns, in essence, this Court's jurisdiction to implead the said defendants and to adjudicate the plaintiffs’ claims against

Muldoon, J.:—The plaintiff, Border Chemical, brings this appeal from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada, by way of trial de novo. The matter at issue is whether the plaintiff's former subsidiary corporation is entitled to deduct

The Associate Chief Justice:—The applicant seeks an order by way of mandamus under section 18 of the Federal Court Act requiring the respondent to issue certificates pursuant to section 44.25 of the Excise

Cullen, J.:— This is an appeal by way of statement of claim from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada delivered April 17,1985 allowing the defendant's appeal of a notice of reassessment issued by the Minister of National Revenue on Spetember

Rouleau, J.:—This is a motion by the defendant-applicant under Rule 337(5) asking the Court to reconsider the terms of the pronouncement of judgment without a personal appearance. The reasons given in support of this motion are as follows:

Mahoney, J.:—The applicants seek an extension of time within which to bring an application under section 28 of the Federal Court Act to set aside the decision of the Minister of National Revenue, Customs and Excise, which held

Hugessen, J.:—The appellant (plaintiff) was assessed for income tax for the 1976 taxation year by a notice of assessment dated July 15, 1977. On July 14, 1981, within the four-year period prescribed by subsection 152(4) of the Income Tax

Muldoon, J.:—Applying under Rule 324, the defendant moves the Court as constituted at the relevant time, pursuant to Rule 337(5) and (7), to reconsider the terms of the interlocutory order pronounced in this matter on September 22,1986. In the circumstances,

Jerome, A.C.J.:—This application came on for hearing at Toronto, Ontario, on April 21, 1987. The defendant seeks an order under Rules 440, 460 and 465(20) dismissing the plaintiff's action for failure to give full discovery and for want of prosecution.

Pratte, J.: —This is an appeal from an order of the Trial Division dismissing an application made by Her Majesty under Rule 341 of the Federal Court Rules. By that application, Her Majesty sought a judgment summarily dismissing the appeal