Reed, J.:—This case deals with the claim of a person from whom certain moneys have been stolen, for recovery of those moneys, and the claim of the Crown for taxes owing on the stolen funds, as income in the hands of the thief. Both

Pinard, J. [Translation]:—By her action the plaintiff is claiming various amounts from the defendant as customs duties, sales tax and a penalty. The customs duty rate is set by the Customs Tariff Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-41, and

Le juge Gendreau:—L’appelant, Le Procureur général du Canada, se pourvoit contre un jugement de la Cour supérieure qui a rejeté sa requête en certiorari logé contre un mandat de perquisition émis par un juge de paix et qui autorisait le

Davies, J. [Orally]:—The plaintiff claims the sum of $9,840.14 under subsection 52(10) of the Excise Tax Act. Subsection 52(10) reads as follows:

Steele, J.:—Two motions were heard by the Court. One, by the applicant Thomas A. Corr (Corr) and others, is to strike out four “informations to obtain a search warrant pursuant to s. 231.3 of the Income Tax Act” and to

Hugessen, J.:—In 1978 the appellants acquired shares in the capital stock of their employer, Mitchell Installations Ltd. (“Mitchell”). Since Mitchell is a “Canadian controlled, private company”*, [1] they claim that they are taxable under the

Rouleau, J. [Translation]:—This is an application to review an order by the Minister of National Revenue which directed the applicant to pay forthwith the total amount of the reassessments made for 1983 and 1984. The total amount of tax, penalties and

Pinard, J. [Translation]:—This is an appeal in the form of an action pursuant to subsections 172(1) and 175(3) of the Income Tax Act, SC 1970-71-72, c. 63, as amended, brought by the taxpayer M.S.S. Inc. against a decision of

Joyal, J.:—This matter concerns an ex parte application by the plaintiffs for an order for service ex juris on two named defendants residing in Seattle, Washington, namely, Reginald H. Norberg and Donald J. Sasnett.

Pratte, J.:—This is an appeal from a judgment of Rouleau, J. of the Trial Division allowing with costs the respondent's appeal from income tax reassessments made by the Minister of National Revenue in respect of the respondent's 1973, 1974 and 1975