Amway of Canada Limited/Amway Du Canada Ltée. v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1987] 1 CTC 105 -- text

Mahoney, J. (Heald, J concurring):—This is an appeal from an interlocutory order by the other defendant in the action described in my concurrent reasons for judgment in appeal no. A-365-86. For the reasons given therein, I accept that

MTD Products Limited v. The Tariff Board of Canada Et Al., [1987] 1 CTC 84 -- text

Dubé, J:—This motion (heard all day yesterday) is for a writ of prohibition restraining the Tariff Board from holding a hearing to reconsider its decision dated September 19, 1986 in Reference/Appeal No. 2294. The Board hearing is to be held tomorrow,

Her Majesty the Queen v. Darrell Gordon Schacher, [1987] 1 CTC 75 -- text

Ketchum, Prov. Ct. J.:—The Information against this accused charges four counts of failure to comply with paragraph 231 (3)(a) of the Income Tax Act of Canada. The Crown seeks convictions on all four counts and the imposition of the penalties provided by subsection 238(2) of the Income Tax Act.

Magilb Development Corp. Ltd. v. The Queen, 87 DTC 5012, [1987] 1 CTC 66 (FCTD) -- text

McNair, J.:—This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a decision of the Tax Review Board dated December 22, 1981 whereby the plaintiffs appeals from assessments of income tax for the 1975 and 1976 taxation years were dismissed. The notices of

Baladine Inc., Giovanni Management Ltd., Chelsea Girl (Division of Chelsea Girl Beauty Products Ltd.), Far East Canada Company and Harry Camp of Canada Ltd. v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1987] 1 CTC 38, 86 DTC 6616 -- text

Denault, J. [Translation]:—The plaintiffs are claiming a refund of excise tax paid in error on the importation of wigs. The point at issue is whether the defendant must refund the taxes paid within two years of the applica- tion for a refund

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS