Taylor, TCJ [ORALLY]:—As I see it, I have one problem — the statement made by counsel of record for the appellant that he is unable to proceed this afternoon, and requests an adjournment. From the Board’s viewpoint, the matter has been

St-Onge, TCJ [ORALLY]:—I think I have to agree with counsel for the Minister in this case. I have to look at this first delay, the ninety days, and the only reason given by the taxpayer in this case is ignorance of the law. This is not

Urie, J:—The sole issue in this appeal from a judgment of Cattanach, J in the Trial Division is whether the respondent was entitled to claim, in the computation of his taxable income for the taxation years 1977, 1978 and 1979, losses incurred in the

Strayer, J:—The plaintiff appeals the reassessments by the Minister of National Revenue of his income for 1973, 1974, and 1975. He also appeals the imposition of penalties on certain of the reassessed income with respect to these years. He represented himself at the

Addy, J:—The issue before the court is whether the plaintiff is entitled to benefit from the rollover provisions of paragraph 44(1 )(b) of the Income Tax Act with regard to an eleven-suite apartment building situated at 119, 29th Avenue

Rouleau, J:—These two actions were heard together on essentially common evidence and were the object of identical argument by counsel. Both actions were brought against the Crown pursuant to sections 172 and 175 of the Income Tax Act,

Walsh, J:—Plaintiff moves pursuant to Rule 1718(3) and 603 of the Federal Court Rules for an order striking the defendant’s cross-demand herein and more specifically paragraphs 56 to 80 and conclusions 2, 3 and 4 thereof, or alternatively that the

Mahoney, J:—This is an appeal pursuant to section 60 of the Excise Tax Act from a decision of the Tariff Board which held that two compressors and ancillary equipment, hereafter the “booster compressors”, were not exempt from

Strayer, J:—I issued reasons for judgment in this case on February 15, 1985. I requested counsel for the defendant to draft a judgment in accordance with the reasons and if necessary to seek further directions. Counsel for both parties appeared before

Smith, J:—This matter is before me on a case stated at the request of the Attorney General of Canada pursuant to section 762 of the Criminal Code. A second and similar stated case in the matter of Steve Dzagic will follow the