Collier, J:—This was a motion, under Rule 344, for special directions in respect of the costs of this action. There is a similar motion in a companion action, Smith v The Queen, T-2444-80.

Collier, J:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board. Only the 1974 taxation year is before the court.

Stone, J:—This action, together with the action in Court No A-758-81 were tried together on common evidence before Addy, J at Toronto on September 10, and 11, 1981 and were argued together on appeal. They each concern attacks upon separate assessments made under

Urie, J:—This appeal is from a judgment of the Trial Division [now reported at [1983] 1 FC 314] which allowed the appeals of the respondent from assessments made by the Minister of National Revenue in respect of the respondent’s 1971, 1972, 1973

The Chief Justice:—This is an appeal under section 60 of the Excise Tax Act from a decision of the Tariff Board which declared, on an application under section 59 of the Act, that the plastic or wooden soft drink cases

Walsh, J:—An application by defendant for an order compelling plaintiff to give full discovery in accordance with the Court of Appeal’s order of December 30, 1982 and providing for further discovery of plaintiff or that the action be dismissed and

Walsh, J:—This is a motion dated the 9th day of August, 1983 on behalf of the plaintiff, for an order pursuant to section 24 of Part I of The Constitution Act, 1982 requiring the defendant to return all copies in its

Walsh, J:—This is a motion on behalf of defendant seeking an order as follows:

Muldoon, J [ORALLY]:—This is an action in the nature of an appeal from a decision or judgment of the Tax Review Board, registered as Number 80-320 signed at Ottawa November 23, 1981.

Heald, J:—This is an appeal, by leave of the Court, and pursuant to section 60 of the Excise Tax Act, from a declaration of the Tariff Board, wherein the Board, by a majority decision, dismissed the appellant’s application for a