The Queen v. Burnco Industries Ltd., 84 DTC 6348, [1984] CTC 337 (FCA) -- text
Pratte, J [ORALLY]:—We are all of opinion that the appeal must succeed.
The Queen v. Lusita Holdings, 84 D.T.C 6346, [1984] CTC 335 (FCA) -- text
Stone, J:—This appeal is brought against the judgment of the Trial Division which vacated the respondent’s 1975, 1976 and 1977 income tax assessments and referred its returns for those years back to the Minister of National Revenue for reassessment on
Vaughan’s Moving & Storage Co Ltd, and Keith Vaughan v. Her Majesty the Queen as Represented by the Minister of National Revenue, [1984] CTC 333 -- text
The Associate Chief Justice:—This action came on for trial at Yorkton, Saskatchewan, on October 4, 1983. At issue is the allegation by the plaintiffs that certain funds seized by the defendant from Armstrong The Mover (Saskatchewan) Ltd were not
Her Majesty the Queen as Represented by the Minister of National Revenue v. Ruth Beverly Bourassa, [1984] CTC 331 -- text
Muldoon, J:—The application brought by the Crown relates to execution levied against a mobile home situated at Ryley, in Alberta, pursuant to a certificate filed in this Court for income tax arrears.
Canadian Marconi Co. v. The Queen, 84 DTC 6267, [1984] CTC 319 (FCA), rev'd 86 DTC 6526, [1986] 2 CTC 465, [1986] 2 SCR 522 -- text
Ryan, J:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing an appeal, brought by the appellant, Canadian Marconi Company, from income tax reassessments for its 1973, 1974, 1975 and 1976 taxation years.
In re Cochrane, [1984] CTC 291 (FCTD) -- text
Cattanach, J:—These are two applications based on certificates for the 1971 and 1972 taxation years the styles of which differ, made pursuant to rule 324 for orders for the removal and sale of the identical property being 141 shares of Glenalta Business Services Ltd. registered in the name of Dr. William H.
Her Majesty the Queen v. The Ennisclare Corporation, [1984] CTC 286, 84 DTC 6262 -- text
Stone J:—Worland Holdings Limited was incorporated under the laws of Ontario and had its head office in the town of Oakville. After instituting this action in August of 1980 its name was changed to The Ennisclare Corporation, the respondent in this
Bunge of Canada Ltd. v. The Queen, 84 DTC 6276, [1984] CTC 284 (FCA) -- text
Pratte J:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing the appellant’s appeal from an income tax reassessment in respect of its 1978 taxation year.
Zygocki v. The Queen, 84 DTC 6283, [1984] CTC 280 (FCTD) -- text
Strayer, J:—This judgment proceeded to trial on the basis of a statement of agreed facts. I shall summarize them briefly.
The Queen v. Landsman, 84 DTC 6278, [1984] CTC 274 (FCA) -- text
Le Dain, J:—This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division allowing an appeal in respect of a reassessment under the Estate Tax Act, SC 1958, c 29, as amended, against the estate of the late
Pages
