The Queen v. Royal Trust Corp. of Canada, 83 DTC 5172, [1983] CTC 159 (FCA) -- text

Urie, J:—It is common ground that the sole issue in this appeal from the Trial Division is whether the sum of $175,500 which the United Trust Company (“United Trust”) paid to Pitfield, MacKay, Ross & Company Limited (“Pitfield”) in 1972 was an

Golden v. The Queen, 83 DTC 5138, [1983] CTC 112 (FCA), aff'd supra. -- text

Heald, J:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division whereby the appellant’s 1973 income tax assessment was referred back to the Minister of National Revenue for further reassessment on the basis that the consideration for the disposition of

Frederick G Vivian and Rex T Parsons v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1983] CTC 107, [1983] DTC 5144 -- text

Mahoney, J:—This is a management company case. It was tried together on common evidence with Rex T Parsons v The Queen, Court file no T-2660-81. Parsons testified first; the plaintiff, Frederick G Vivian, was excluded

The Queen v. Yates, 83 DTC 5158, [1983] CTC 105 (FCTD), aff'd 86 DTC 6296 [1986] 2 CTC 46 (FCA) -- text

Mahoney, J:—This action was tried on common evidence with a like action against the defendant’s wife, May Yates, Court file no T-4484-81. The evidence consisted entirely of the transcript of the Tax Review Board hearing, which included a partial agreed

Her Majesty the Queen v. Gerrit Jan Van De Wygerdand Dame Henderika Alida Ten Veen, Intervenant., [1983] CTC 99, 83 DTC 5159 -- text

Walsh, J:—A provisional order was issued in this matter against defendant on November 29, 1976, resulting from a certificate produced on November 25, 1976, for income tax arrears for the years of 1973, 1974 and 1975, total- ling $100,419.18, which

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS