Jérome, ACJ:—This appeal from the decision of the Tax Review Board, dated November 5, 1980, involving the 1972-73-74 and 1975 taxation years of Royal Trust Corporation of Canada came on for hearing at Toronto on June 26, 1981. The plaintiff Royal
LeDain, J:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board which had dismissed an appeal from a reassessment in respect of the 1969 taxation year of the late Roy J
LeDain, J:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division allowing an appeal from a reassessment of income tax in respect of the respondent’s 1977 taxation year.
Mahoney, J:—This is an application, pursuant to paragraph 232(4)(c) of the Income Tax Act, for a determination whether or not the applicants have a solicitor-client privilege in respect of certain documents. The respondent seized them from
Gibson, J:—The plaintiff abandoned his “principal residence” submission. According to the evidence he had not closed the purchase and sale of any of the subject houses and accordingly had never moved into any of them. The plaintiff’s sole submission is
Thurlow, CJ:—We do not need to hear from you Mr Lefebvre and Ms Olsen.
Thurlow, CJ:—We do not need to hear from you Mr Gill and Mrs Van Der Hout.
Collier, J:—On January 29, 1977 an interim agreement of sale was reached between the plaintiff and the then owners of an apartment building. The closing date was March 1, 1977. The building was known as Hampton Court. The purchase price paid by
Mahoney, J:—Margaret Van Gastel, hereafter “the applicant” seeks, (a) pursuant to Rule 469, an interim and interlocutory injunction restraining the Sheriff of the County of Brant, Ontario, certain named officials of the Department of National Revenue, Taxation, and
Ryan, J:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division allowing with costs the appeal of the respondent from assessments for its taxation years ending on November 30 and December 31, 1969 (two of its taxation years ended in 1969)
