Garneau Marine Co LTD v. Minister of National Revenue, [1982] CTC 2191, 82 DTC 1171 -- text

D E Taylor:—This is an appeal heard in Edmonton, Alberta on February 8, 1982, against income tax assessments in which the Minister of National Revenue disallowed deductions claimed as interest expenses in the amounts of $2,905.56 and $10,216.03

Robert L Thompson, Evelyn M Thompson v. Minister of National Revenue, [1982] CTC 2187, 82 DTC 1168 -- text

D E Taylor:—These appeals heard in Edmonton, Alberta, on February 8, 1982 against income tax assessments in which the Minister of National Revenue assessed each appellant to an amount of $2,729.47 and $3,831.33 for the years 1977 and 1978

Helmut Mueller v. Minister of National Revenue, [1982] CTC 2182, 82 DTC 1174 -- text

D E Taylor:—These appeals were heard in London, Ontario, on January 18, 1982, and are against income tax assessments for the years 1977, 1978 and 1979 in which the Minister of National Revenue disallowed certain amounts of capital losses claimed

Panelling Unlimited of London Incorporated v. Minister of National Revenue, [1982] CTC 2178 -- text

John B Goetz:—This is an appeal by the appellant with respect to its 1977 taxation year. At the outset of the hearing, by agreement between counsel, it was agreed that the issues involved would apply as well to the 1978 taxation year.

William Greenspoon, Mid-North Iron & Metals Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1982] CTC 2163, 82 DTC 1181 -- text

Guy Tremblay:—These cases were heard in Sudbury, Ontario on June 17, 1981. At the beginning of the trial it was agreed between the parties that the cases be heard on common evidence because the various reassessments involved in the cases relate to

Florence Epstein v. Minister of National Revenue, [1982] CTC 2147, 82 DTC 1168, [1982] CTC 2152, [1982] DTC 1164 -- text

Assistant Chairman:—Florence Epstein has appealed to this Board from an assessment of income tax for the 1975 taxation year. For that year, the respondent added to her income the sum of $11,200. The issue is whether or not that sum was correctly

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS