John B Goetz:—This is an appeal with respect to the appellant’s 1976 taxation year. It was agreed by counsel that the appeals of Rosalind Wai-Yue Cheng Wong with respect to her 1976, 1977 and 1978 taxation years (80-

John B Goetz:—This is an appeal by the appellant with respect to its taxation year ending June 5, 1978.

M J Bonner [ORALLY]:—This is an appeal from an assessment of income tax for the 1979 taxation year. The issue is whether the Minister was correct in denying the deduction claimed by the appellant under paragraph 110(1)(h) of the Income

The Chairman [TRANSLATION]:—This appeal by Construction Sylvain Ltée is from an assessment by the Minister of National Revenue for the taxation year 1979. The point for decision in the case at bar is the fair market value of the appellant’s inventory

John B Goetz [ORALLY]:—I might point out Mr Midyette, that I have carefully examined the material in the file that was handed to me, your notice of appeal as well as the reply to the notice of appeal, and your appeal relates to

D E Taylor [ORALLY]:—This is an appeal from Eva Edna Racette with respect to the amount of money ($67,800) received as a result of a judgment dated July 6, 1977 from the Court of Queen’s Bench of Saskatchewan. The matter at issue is

Roland St-Onge [ORALLY]:—The appeals of Mr and Mrs Quinten Van de Vrie came before me on August 31 and September 1, 1982 in the City of London, Province of Ontario and were heard on common evidence. The issue has to do with valuation of

M J Bonner:—The appellant appeals from assessments of income tax for the 1978 and 1979 taxation years. At all relevant times the appellant was a citizen of the United States of America, a resident of Canada and was employed in Canada by

John B Goetz:—This is an appeal with respect to the 1977 and 1978 taxation years of the appellant Selwyn Chamberlain. It was agreed that the appeals of Romano Giusti and Terrance Robertson would be heard at the same time and counsel

M J Bonner:—This is an appeal from an assessment of income tax for the appellant’s 1978 taxation year. The issue is whether the person taxable as recipient of interest income in the amount of $49,458.91 from two consecutive term deposits of