Gibson J:—John J Daly appeals from re-assessments for income tax in these two actions which were tried on common evidence. The first action (T-3435-74), an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board confirming the re-assessments for the income tax,

Cattanach, J:—The Minister of National Revenue certified, under section 223 of the Income Tax Act, that Kenneth Allen had not paid tax assessed against him and produced to this Court a certificate to that effect, which upon

Heald, J:—The sole issue in this appeal is whether the amount of $490,050 paid by the respondent to the city of Calgary was a current expense in the 1973 taxation year, the year in which it was paid or whether the Said amount was

Thorson, JA:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Divisional Court, dismissing the appellant’s application for judicial review of a decision made by the Minister of Revenue for Ontario, refusing to refund to the appellant an alleged overpayment of

Montgomery, J:—This is an application to this court by way of trial provided for under subsection 2 of section 20 of The Retail Sales Tax Act, RSO 1970, c 415, and amendments thereto. There is also provision for the

Dube, J:—The basic issue in this action is whether or not the plaintiff in the taxation year 1972 was carrying on a business in a country other than Canada and thus not obligated to withhold the tax payable by a nonresident on interests

The Chief Justice:— This appeal is from a judgment of the Trial Division answering a question that had been set down for determination before trial under Rule 474. The action was brought by the respondent seeking declarations with respect

Gibson, J:—The Province of British Columbia established a sea bus system connecting North Vancouver with the Vancouver city centre, which system opened in 1977. The Province of British Columbia did this, according to the evidence, to provide a third crossing

Addy, J:—The action involves income tax assessed against the defendant for taxation years 1967 to 1970 inclusively, pursuant to reassessments made against it for certain gains realized from share and option transactions as well as interest received by the

Mahoney, J:—This is an appeal from the reassessment of the plaintiff’s 1977 income tax return. The trial was heard together and on common evidence with an appeal by the plaintiff’s wife from the reassessment of her 1977 return. Both plaintiffs are