Paolo Violi v. Minister of National Revenue, [1980] CTC 2228, 80 DTC 1191 -- text
The Chairman [TRANSLATION]:—This is an appeal by Mr Paolo Violi against tax assessments for the 1971, 1972, 1973 and 1974 taxation years.
The Chairman [TRANSLATION]:—This is an appeal by Mr Paolo Violi against tax assessments for the 1971, 1972, 1973 and 1974 taxation years.
The Assistant Chairman:—Once again, as in many other appeals, the question as to whether or not the income of a corporation for the year is “from an active business’’ is the issue in this appeal. If the income in question is from an
M J Bonner:—I will now give the reasons for my decision in the Valani appeals.
The Chairman:—This is the appeal of Mr Arthur Ballantyne from income tax assessments in respect to the 1974 and 1975 taxation years, by which the Minister in adjusting the appellant’s reported income added a taxable capital gain of $7,710.75 for 1974
The Chairman:—The appeal of Donald Kilgour Campbell from an assessment in respect of the 1975 taxation year was heard on common evidence with that of Stanley M Smith.
The Assistant Chairman:— The Minister of National Revenue (the respondent), for each of the years 1972, 1973 and 1974, added to the reported income of William J Legere (the appellant) an amount being part of the amount which a corporation,
Delmer E Taylor:—This is an appeal heard in Victoria, British Columbia, on January 1,1980 against income tax assessments for the years 1975 and 1976. In 1975, the Minister of National Revenue increased the taxable income of the appellant by an
Roland St-Onge [TRANSLATION]:—The appeal of Mr Lucien Barbeau came before me on December 4,1979 in Quebec City, Quebec. The point at issue is whether the respondent was justified in imposing penalties on the appellant in respect of his 1973, 1974, and
Delmer E Taylor:—This is an appeal heard in the City of Vancouver, British Columbia, on December 6, 1979, against income tax assessments for the years 1974 and 1975. In these assessments, the Minister of National Revenue altered the appellant’s V-Day
John B Goetz:—This is an appeal relating to the appellant’s 1976 taxation year whereby the Minister asserts that certain monies paid out to the appellant in the year 1976 under a registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) were income to the