D E Taylor:—This is an appeal heard at the City of Toronto, Ontario, on September 24, 1980, against an income tax assessment for the year 1973 in which the Minister of National Revenue added an amount of $98,435.14 to the reported taxable
D E Taylor:—This is an appeal heard in Toronto, Ontario, on September 25, 1980, against an income tax assessment for 1969 in which the Minister of National Revenue added an amount of $63,110.56 to the reported income of the appellant. In
John B Goetz:—The appellant has filed a notice of appeal for the 1974, 1976 and 1977 taxation years. In particular, he claims $6,800 with respect to the cost of horses acquired, as he says, in 1974, as well as other expenses incurred
John B Goetz:—This is an appeal by the appellant with respect to his income tax liability for his 1972 and 1973 taxation years. The appellant and the respondent agreed on a statement of facts which succinctly sets the basic issues before
Roland St Onge [TRANSLATION]:—The appeal of Mr Louis Dorion came before me on December 5, 1979 at Quebec City, Quebec. The question is whether a sum of $8,000 paid by the appellant to his former spouse during the 1976 taxation year is
Guy Tremblay [TRANSLATION]:—These cases were heard on common evidence at Montreal, Quebec on May 15, 1979.
M J Bonner:—These appeals were heard together on common evidence. The appellants appealed from assessments of income tax made on the basis that profits realized on the sale in 1974 and 1976 of certain land were income.
M J Bonner:—These appeals were heard together on common evidence. Each appellant appeals from assessments of income tax for the 1974, 1975 and 1976 taxation years. For 1974 the Minister included in income the gain realized on the sale of land
The Chairman:—The appeals of Mr Anilkant Mody and Mrs Kumud Mody were heard on common evidence. The issue is whether the amount of profits realized by the appellants in the disposition of certain properties in the taxation years 1974 and 1975 are
The Chairman:— The appeal of Robert C Rickerd is from an assessment in respect of the 1976, 1977 and 1978 taxation years, for which the appellant claimed business expenses in the amounts of $4,109.72, $3,549.16 and $4,686.67 respectively. Of those
