Wetston J.: — This is an appeal by way of trial de novo from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada, dated April 5, 1991, which allowed the defendant’s appeal from reassessments for the taxation years 1980, 1981, 1982,

Strayer J.: — The attached reasons delivered in Sokolowska v. R. (Doc. A-633-95) also constitute the reasons of the Court in this appeal.

Jerome A.C.J.: — In this application brought pursuant to Rules 474(1) and 474(2) of the Federal Court Rules, the plaintiffs seek an Order striking paragraph 56 of the Amended Statement of Defence which refers to a set-off

MacKay J.: — An application is made for an extension of time to bring an application for judicial review, pursuant to section 18.1 of the Federal Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7, as amended, (the “Act”), concerning a

Rothstein J.T.C.C.: — On this motion to vacate reassessments by reason of the Minister not proceeding with all due dispatch to confirm the reassessments, the Court is bound by the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Bolton

Jerome J.T.C.C.: —

Hugessen J.A.: — In this appeal we are called upon to decide whether the provision of free access to the information highway is a charitable activity so as to qualify the organization providing such access as a registered charity within the meaning

Robertson J.A.: — This appeal was heard together with the appeal in Court File No. A-348-94. For the reasons given in that appeal, a copy of which is annexed hereto, I would dismiss this appeal with costs on the basis set forth in

McDonald J.A.: — This application has been heard at the same time as the application in court file A426/95. A copy of these reasons will be filed in court file A426/95 and will constitute the reasons for judgment in that file.

Thackray J.: — The petitioners ask for an order pursuant to section 232(4) of the Income Tax Act that they have solicitor-client privilege over the file of Douglas W. Welder. Mr. Welder is a barrister and solicitor who