Simpson J.: — Let the attached transcript of my Reasons for Order delivered orally from the Bench in Toronto, Ontario, the 2nd day of April, 1996, now edited, be filed to comply with section 51 of the Federal Court Act.

Wetston J.: - This is an appeal by way of trial de novo from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada, dated August 21, 1989, which dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal from income tax reassessments for the taxation years

Hargrave P.: — These reasons arise out of the Defendants’ motion to strike out the Statement of Claim under Rule 419(l)(a), (c) and (f), that it discloses no reasonable cause of action, that it is scandalous, frivolous or vexatious, and that

Rothstein J.T.C.C.: -

Wetston J.: — This is an appeal by way of trial de novo from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada, dated April 5, 1991, which allowed the defendant’s appeal from reassessments for the taxation years 1980, 1981, 1982,

Strayer J.: — The attached reasons delivered in Sokolowska v. R. (Doc. A-633-95) also constitute the reasons of the Court in this appeal.

Jerome A.C.J.: — In this application brought pursuant to Rules 474(1) and 474(2) of the Federal Court Rules, the plaintiffs seek an Order striking paragraph 56 of the Amended Statement of Defence which refers to a set-off

MacKay J.: — An application is made for an extension of time to bring an application for judicial review, pursuant to section 18.1 of the Federal Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7, as amended, (the “Act”), concerning a

Rothstein J.T.C.C.: — On this motion to vacate reassessments by reason of the Minister not proceeding with all due dispatch to confirm the reassessments, the Court is bound by the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Bolton

Jerome J.T.C.C.: —