William Dickson v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 2351 (Informal Procedure) -- text
McArthur J.T.C.C.: — This appeal was heard in Edmonton, Alberta under the Informal Procedure of this Court with respect to the Appellant’s 1992 taxation year.
McArthur J.T.C.C.: — This appeal was heard in Edmonton, Alberta under the Informal Procedure of this Court with respect to the Appellant’s 1992 taxation year.
Teskey J.T.C.C.: - The Appellant, in his Notice of Appeal herein, appealed his 1993 assessment of income tax, and elected and to have it heard pursuant to the Informal Procedure.
St-Onge J.T.C.C.: — The appeal of Suman Dhondge was heard on the 25th of June 1996 in the City of Toronto, Ontario, and the issue is whether the Appellant has to pay income taxes on employment income which includes a benefit for
Taylor J.T.C.C.: — This is an appeal, under the Informal Procedure, heard in Victoria, British Columbia on July 9, 1996, against an assessment under the Income Tax Act (the “Act”) for the year 1992, in which the
Dussault J.T.C.C.: — This is an appeal from a reassessment contained in a notice dated April 22, 1994 for the appellant’s 1990 taxation year. By that assessment the Minister of National Revenue (the “Minister”) added to the appellant’s income an
Bowman J.T.C.C.: — This appeal is from an assessment for the appellant’s 1992 taxation year. The question is the deductibility of certain expenses incurred by the appellant in connection with what he alleges is a business of writing and publishing
Christie J.T.C.C.: — These appeals are governed by the informal procedure provided for under section 18 and following sections of the Tax Court of Canada Act. The years under appeal are 1992 and 1993.
O’Connor J.T.C.C.: — These appeals were heard on common evidence at Sydney, Nova Scotia, June 24, 1996.
Taylor J.T.C.C.: — These are appeals heard in Calgary, Alberta on May 27, 1996, against amounts for the years 1990 and 1991 in which the Respondent disallowed certain expenses claimed against rental income from real property. The Reply to Notice
Bowman J.T.C.C. (orally): — These matters are proceeding under the informal provisions of the Act and I am of the opinion that the motion is one of sufficient importance that it has to be met. And it would appear that while