Cheta v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2298, 98 DTC 1805 -- text
O’Connor T.C.J.:
944787 Ontario Inc. v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2293, 98 DTC 1714 -- text
Brulé T.C.J.:
Onraet v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2291 -- text
Bell T.C.J.:
McRae v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2283 -- text
Bonner T.C.J.:
McPherson v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2278, 98 DTC 1715 -- text
Beaubier T.C.J.:
Makowetski v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2271 -- text
Bell T.C.J.:
The issue is whether the Appellant is entitled to a deduction for income tax purposes in respect of alimony or maintenance payments in his 1992, 1993 and 1994 taxation years.
Lutken v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2264 -- text
Teskey T.C.J. .
The Appellant, in his Notice of Appeal wherein he appeals his reassessments of income tax for the years 1993 and 1994, elected the Informal Procedure.
Loukine v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2258, 98 DTC 1566 -- text
Bowman T.C.J.:
Laing v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2252 -- text
Beaubier T.C.J.:
This appeal pursuant to the Informal Procedure was heard at Winnipeg, Manitoba on March 2, 1998.
Kaye v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2248, 98 DTC 1659 -- text
Bowman T.C.J.:
Pages
