Luckhardt v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2339, 98 DTC 1804 -- text
O’Connor T.C.J. (orally):
Considering the Request to Admit, dated November 17, 1995, to which the Appellant did not respond, with the result that the facts therein are deemed to be admitted;
Fougere v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2318 -- text
Beaubier T.C.J.:
This appeal, pursuant to the Informal Procedure, was heard at Halifax, Nova Scotia on September 25, 1997. The Appellant’s husband, Robert MacKay, testified.
D’aoust v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2309, 98 DTC 1344 -- text
Lamarre T.C.J.:
Curwin v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2305 -- text
Garon T.C.J.:
Cheta v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2298, 98 DTC 1805 -- text
O’Connor T.C.J.:
944787 Ontario Inc. v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2293, 98 DTC 1714 -- text
Brulé T.C.J.:
Onraet v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2291 -- text
Bell T.C.J.:
McRae v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2283 -- text
Bonner T.C.J.:
McPherson v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2278, 98 DTC 1715 -- text
Beaubier T.C.J.:
Makowetski v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2271 -- text
Bell T.C.J.:
The issue is whether the Appellant is entitled to a deduction for income tax purposes in respect of alimony or maintenance payments in his 1992, 1993 and 1994 taxation years.
Pages
