Paul v. R., [1999] 1 CTC 2713, 99 DTC 99 -- text

McArthur T.C.J.:

The Appellants’ appeal the assessments of revenue wherein the Minister of National Revenue determined they are liable to pay $24,648.33 pursuant to section 160 of the Income Tax Act (the “Acf").

The Appellants owned all of the shares of Gambier Developments Ltd. (Gambier). The Minister determined that Gambier was liable in October

29-03-18

Papineau v. R., [1999] 1 CTC 2706, 99 DTC 350 -- text

Bell T.C.J.:

Issues: (L-7/R5098/T0/BT0) test_marked_paragraph_end (374) 1.011 0882_2287_2377

The issues in this appeal are:

I. Whether mortgage debt of a partnership of which the Appellant was a member was extinguished in his 1989 taxation year. The Minister of National Revenue (“Minister”) reassessed the Appellant for that year adding capital gain in the sum of $84,499 and adding recaptured capital cost allowance in the sum of $31,275; and

Ouzilleau v. R., [1999] 1 CTC 2701 -- text

Lamarre Proulx T.C.J.:

These appeals were heard on common evidence under the informal procedure. They concern the application of paragraph 8(1)() and subparagraph 8( 1 )(i)(iii) of the Income Tax Act ("the Act’) for the 1994 taxation year.

The issue is whether the appellants, in computing their employment income, can deduct the cost of purchasing the computers they acquired under their contracts of employment.

Mori v. R., [1999] 1 CTC 2684 -- text

Beaubier T . C.J.:

This appeal pursuant to the informal procedure was heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on October 6th, 1998. The Appellant testified, the Respondent called its auditor on the file, Robert Bidlake.

At the outset, the Appellant’s agent acknowledged liability for most of the assessments. As a result, two assessments remained in dispute between the parties. They are dealt with as follows:

Maan v. R., [1999] 1 CTC 2677, 99 DTC 175 -- text

Bell T.C.J.:

Issue: (L40/R5158/T0/BT0) test_marked_paragraph_end (440) 0.965 0852_9091_9173

This is an application under section 167 of the Income Tax Act (“Act”) for an Order extending the time within which an appeal may be instituted.

The Applicant, through his counsel, by letter of June 5, 1998 requested the above extension of time.

McMaster v. R., [1999] 1 CTC 2658 -- text

Lamarre Proulx T.C.J. .

This is an appeal from an assessment made by the Minister of National Revenue (“the Minister”) for the 1995 taxation year.

The issue is whether the appellant is entitled to the physical impairment tax credit provided for in section 118.3 of the Income Tax Act (“the Act”) because of gluten-sensitive enteropathy, commonly known as celiac disease.

Marquis v. R., [1999] 1 CTC 2653 -- text

Tardif T.C.J.:

This is an appeal for the 1993 taxation year.

The appellant testified in support of his appeal; he explained that he had guaranteed a $34,000 loan made to Jean-Guy Asselin personally by the Na- tional Bank of Canada on June 12, 1989.

As he knew Jean-Guy Asselin well, the appellant agreed to guarantee it so he could obtain the loan in the aforesaid amount in order to invest in the company 2644-8472 Québec Inc., for which he was working. This was a business which printed documents.

Lavoie v. R, [1999] 1 CTC 2647, 98 DTC 1966 -- text

Tremblay T . C.J.:

Point at issue (L6/R4520/T0/BT0) test_marked_paragraph_end (224) 1.046 0823_1449_1581

According to the Notice of Appeal and the Reply to the Notice of Appeal, the question is whether the appellant is correct in maintaining that she is not liable under s. 160 of the Income Tax Act (“the Act”) to pay tax in the amount of $20,451.78.

Jones v. R., [1999] 1 CTC 2644, 99 DTC 1067 -- text

Bonner T.C.J. .

This is an appeal from an assessment of income tax for the Appellant’s 1995 taxation year. The assessment was made on the basis that section 79 of the Income Tax Act (“Act”) required the inclusion in income of $1,343,384 as the deemed proceeds of disposition of a parcel of land in Milton, Ontario.

The Appellant is a land developer. The land in question was acquired in 1990 by 731418 Ontario Inc. (“731418”). It is common ground that 731418 acted at all relevant times as trustee for the Appellant.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS