Harold J Sachs v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2459, 79 DTC 415 -- text

The Assistant Chairman:—By way of reassessments, the Minister of National Revenue added a different amount to the reported income of Harold J Sachs (the appellant) for each of the years 1975 and 1976, and in the accompanying T7W-C for each year

William Wallace v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2459, 79 DTC 407 -- text

The Assistant Chairman:—The reasons for judgment in principal are the same as those given concurrently in the appeal of Jacob J Thiessen, a copy of which is attached hereto, with one major change. The number of meals the appellant can claim at five dollars per meal shall be 556.

Appeal allowed.

David Prussick v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2455, 79 DTC 386 -- text

Delmer E Taylor:—This is an appeal heard in the City of Montreal, Quebec, on October 12, 1978, against an income tax assessment in which the Minister of National Revenue assessed tax on the basis of a “deemed” dividend allegedly received by

Michael a Steeves v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2445, 79 DTC 378 -- text

Roland St-Onge:—The appeal of Michael A Steeves came before me on April 2,1979 at the City of Toronto, Ontario and the issue is whether the appellant can claim the interest and the dividend deduction of $1000 by virtue of section 110.1 of the

John M Fowlis, Receiver and Manager for Mackenzie Air Limited, Peat Marwick Ltd, Receiver and Manager for Mackenzie Air (Sask) LTD v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2433, 79 DTC 369 -- text

Roland St-Onge:—The appeals of Mr John M Fowlis, receiver and manager for MacKenzie Air Limited and Peat Marwick Ltd, receiver and manager for MacKenzie Air (Sask) Ltd came before me on February 12,1979 at the City of Toronto, Ontario, and were

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS