Le Dain, J (concurred in by Urie, J and MacKay, DJ):—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing an appeal from a reassessment by the respondent in respect of the 1968 taxation year whereby a loss claimed as a

The Chief Justice:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division allowing an appeal from an assessment for gift tax based on what is described in the assessment as “inadequate considerations”, in respect of shares “sold” by the

Decary, J:—Three causes for action have been joined in this matter: Charles and David Malka, plaintiffs, have each lodged an appeal for having been assessed each on his part of a profit derived from an alleged adventure in the nature of trade

Walsh, J:—This is an action by appellant against an assessment dated February 28, 1977, in which the Minister of National Revenue did not take into account interest payable to the estate Felix Goyer in reimbursing the sum of $87,445.45 of overpaid

The Chief Justice (concurred in by Le Dain, J and Hyde, DJ) (judgment delivered from the Bench):—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing an appeal from reassessments of the appellant under Part I of the

Heald, J (concurred in by Jackett, CJ and Ryan, J) (judgment delivered from the Bench):—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing an appeal from the Tax Review Board which in turn had dismissed the appellant’s appeal from

Dube, J:—This is an application by the defendant for an order striking out subparagraphs 9(c) and 9(d) of the statement of claim on the ground that they disclose no cause of action, and striking out Subparagraphs 9(a) and 9(b) and paragraph 10

Cattanach, J:—These are appeals by the plaintiff from its assessments to income tax by the Minister for the plaintiff’s 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971 and 1972 taxation years whereby the Minister included in the plaintiff’s income gains realized by it in those

Walsh, J:—This case concerns the reassessment of plaintiff's taxes for the 1969 year. His appeal from same to the Tax Review Board was dismissed, notification of judgment being sent to him on September 23, 1976. Similar reassessments were made for his

Dube, J:—These are appeals from the assessments for the taxation years 1969, 1970. 1971 and 1972 with reference to amounts received by plaintiff’s spouse from Blacktop Construction Limited for the sale of gravel extracted from her property. The Minister