Le Dain, J:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board, which dismissed the appellant’s appeal from an assessment for income tax in respect of the 1965 taxation
Collier, J:—This appeal was heard on common evidence with another appeal: The Queen v Harry J Perkins (T-462-77).
Urie, J:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division allowing with costs an appeal from a judgment of the Tax Appeal Board, which Board had allowed appeals from re-assessments of the appellant under Part I of the Income
The Chief Justice:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing with costs an appeal from a judgment of the Tax Review Board dismissing an appeal in respect of: assessments under ‘Part I of the Income Tax
Collier, J:—The Plaintiff for the 1975 taxation year, filed a return in which he computed his income in accordance with section 114 of the Income Tax Act, RSC 1952, c 148, as amended by SC 1970-71-72, c 63 and further
Heald, J (concurred in by Ryan, J and Kelly DJ):—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing the appeal of the appellant from an income tax assessment for the taxation year 1972, wherein income tax in the sum of
The Associate Chief Justice:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board which allowed the defendant’s appeal from an assessment of income tax for the year 1973. The issue is whether the defendant is entitled, in computing
Heald, J (concurred in by Urie, J and MacKay, DJ) (judgment delivered from the Bench):—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division in which the learned trial judge held that the respondent, as represented by the Minister of National
Dubinsky, DJ:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board delivered at Halifax, Nova Scotia on July 8, 1976 and from the order of judgment based thereon dated July 27, 1976 whereby it allowed the appeal of the defendant herein,
Walsh, J:—This is a petition seeking an order by virtue of subsection 174(3) of the Income Tax Act joining Jacques Gaston Bisson and Georges Bisson to the proceedings in order to determine the following question:
