Karl F Buchmann and MRS Rose Marie Buchmann v. Minister of National Revenue, [1978] CTC 2135, 78 DTC 1105 -- text

A J Frost:—It was agreed at the commencement of the hearing of the Karl F Buchmann case that the appeal of Rose Marie Buchmann (76-778) would be heard at the same time on common evidence. Both appeals are with respect to the

Victor v Spencer and Mary Spencer v. Minister of National Revenue, [1978] CTC 2109, 78 DTC 1129 -- text

Delmer E Taylor:—These are appeals heard on common evidence, against income tax assessments by which the Minister of National Revenue increased the taxable income of each of the appellants by $32,436.95, $26,500 and $47,725.32 for the years 1971, 1972

Crosbie and Company Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1978] CTC 2091, 78 DTC 1083 -- text

A J Frost:—This is an appeal from a notice of reassessment dated November 2, 1973 with respect to the appellant’s 1972 taxation year wherein the amount of $125,044 paid to Winsor Insurance Agencies Limited pursuant to a letter of confirmation

Mary Assaly, Thomas C Assaly, Ernest Assaly, Louis C Assaly, Laureen Assaly, Trendsetter Developments Limited, Assaly Construction Limited and Gloria Assaly v. Minister of National Revenue, [1978] CTC 2082, 78 DTC 1086 -- text

A W Prociuk:—The above appeals came on for hearing at a special sittings of the Board in Ottawa. The parties agreed that all appeals be heard on common evidence relating to legal and liquidator’s fees. In the case of Louis

Vincenzo Curcio v. Minister of National Revenue, [1978] CTC 2076, 78 DTC 1097 -- text

A W Prociuk (orally: November 15, 1977):—The appellant, Vincenzo Curcio, appeals from the respondent’s reassessment of his income for the taxation years 1967 to 1972 inclusive, on a net worth basis wherein the following amounts of unreported income were

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS