de Grandpré, J (concurred in by Laskin, CJC, Judson, Pigeon and Beetz, JJ) [Translation]:—This appeal poses the following question: When spouses stipulate in their marriage contract that the community property shall belong to the survivor, is there a
Walsh, J:—This income tax appeal was heard on the basis of an agreed Statement of Facts, the only witness testifying being plaintiff himself who had practised law in Winnipeg prior to 1965, but is now a school teacher in Toronto since 1967,
Hyde, DJ (concurred in by Ryan and Le Dain, JJ):—Appellant (Bernstein) has appealed from a judgment of the Trial Division (December 17, 1973) which dismissed his appeal from his assessment for the year 1964 under the Income Tax Act
Urie, J (concurred in by Ryan, J and Kerr, DJ):—For the reasons given in the appeal of Stephen S Steeves v Her Majesty The Queen, Court No A-633-76, the appeal will be dismissed.
Urie, J (concurred in by Ryan, J and Kerr, DJ):—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing with costs the appellant’s appeal from assessments in respect of his 1968, 1969, 1970 and 1971 taxation years. The respondent, in
Addy, J:—This action, as originally constituted, consisted of an appeal by the plaintiff of an assessment for income tax purposes for the taxation year 1969, of revenue-producing apartment buildings in Montreal sold by the plaintiff on December 30, 1969 to
Ruttan, J (in Chambers):—This is an appeal from the decision of the Minister of Finance for the Province of British Columbia made March 14, 1977 affirming a succession duty assessment dated November 15, 1976 which levied succession duties on the value
Pratte, J:—This appeal raises three distinct issues related to the income tax payable by the appellant for the 1966 and 1967 taxation years. Those three issues, which were all decided against the appellant by the trial judge, are referred to in the
Marceau, J:—This is an appeal by Her Majesty the Queen against a judgment of the Tax Review Board vacating an assessment dated November 16, 1973 issued by the Minister of National Revenue in respect of the defendant’s taxation year 1972. The issue
The Chief Justice:—This is a motion by the respondent for an order that costs be paid to the respondent in the amount of $8,626 with interest thereon.* [1]
