The Associate Chief Justice:—In this action, three separate applications have been made on behalf of the Crown for orders under Rule 464(1) requiring persons who are not parties to the action to produce and permit the inspection and copying
Martland, J (orally for the Court):—We are all of the opinion that this appeal fails. It is dismissed with costs.
Collier, J:—In June 1971 the defendant bought a parcel of land near Abbotsford, BC. In June of the next year he sold a 7-acre portion of the parcel. There was a gain in the amount of $31,097. The Minister of National Revenue included
Holmes, DCJ:—This matter is concerned with two counts. In the first count, Charles Vernon Myers and Interpublishing Company Ltd, otherwise known as Inter Publishing Co Ltd were charged that they:
Walsh, J:—This action which seeks a declaratory judgment from the Court interpreting the collection proceedings which can be adopted by the Minister of National Revenue to enforce payment of taxes allegedly due following a notice of reassessment when the said
Addy, J:—The plaintiff is a member of and an owner of a 1/16th interest In a motion picture syndicate, known as the Heyman Syndicate (hereinafter referred to as “the Syndicate’’).
Walsh, J:—Plaintiff applies pursuant to subsection 167(4) of the Income Tax Act for an order extending the time within which an appeal may be instituted by her from a judgment of the Tax Review Board allowing in part her
Addy, J:—The present appeal is against a judgment of the Tax Review Board which allowed an appeal by the taxpayer company, Immobiliare Canada Ltd, a Canadian resident company, against an assessment made on July 19, 1973 relating to the 1966 taxation
Marceau, J:—The plaintiff, a public corporation, was assessed income tax for its 1969, 1970, 1971 and 1972 taxation years by notices of assessment, each of which was dated April 15, 1975.* [1] The assessments were objected to in
Walsh, J.:—This is a motion seeking an order to strike the mise en cause, Jacqueline Sicotte, from the case on the grounds that plaintiff illegally made her a party to it unnecessarily since no remedy is sought against her.
