Gibson,
J:—This
is
an
appeal
from
assessments
for
the
taxpayer
plaintiff’s
taxation
years
1972,
1973
and
1974.
The
income
of
the
plaintiff's
spouse
was
from
dividends
from
Canadian
corporations
in
those
years
as
follows:
|
Actual
Income
|
Grossed-up
Income
|
|
1972
|
$361.74
|
$482.32
|
|
1973
|
481.68
|
642.24
|
|
1974
|
601.69
|
802.25
|
The
said
assessments
are
predicated
upon
the
following:
(1)
The
actual
dividend
income
of
the
plaintiff’s
spouse
was
grossed-
up
one-third
from
the
dividends
actually
received
(see
paragraph
12(1
)(j)
and
subsection
82(1)
of
the
Income
Tax
Act).
(2)
There
were
added
to
the
plaintiff’s
income
from
other
sources
all
amounts
of
his
spouse’s
grossed-up
dividend
income
as
permitted
by
subsection
82(3)
so
that
pursuant
to
that
subsection
that
income
was
‘‘deemed
to
have
been
so
received
by
the
taxpayer
and
not
by
his
spouse”.
In
doing
so,
the
“taxable
income”
of
the
taxpayer
less
the
deductions
permitted
by
Division
C
of
the
Act
was
computed
(see
subsection
2(2)
of
the
Income
Tax
Act).
(3)
There
were
then
deducted
under
Division
C
the
deductions
under
section
109
of
the
Act
namely
$1,600
under
subparagraph
109(1
)(a)(i)
and
$1,400
under
subparagraph
109(1
)(a)(ii).
(No
deduction
was
made
from
this
$1,400
because
the
spouse’s
income
was
deemed
by
subsection
82(3)
to
have
been
the
income
of
the
plaintiff
husband
because
of
his
election
under
that
subsection.)
(The
figures
$1,600
and
$1,400
were
less
in
1972—and
the
correct
figures
were
used.)
(4)
There
was
then
deducted
the
20%
dividend
credit
on
the
grossed-
up
amount
of
the
dividends
pursuant
to
section
121
of
the
Act.
The
taxpayer
submitted
that
he
was
entitled
to
deduct
under
section
109
of
the
Act
part
of
the
dividend
income
of
his
spouse
before
electing
and
adding
the
balance
of
such
income
to
his
taxable
income
under
subsection
82(3).
In
this
he
is
in
error.
Section
109
only
comes
into
operation
after
the
taxpayer’s
taxable
income
has
been
computed,
and
subsection
82(3)
makes
it
mandatory
in
computing
his
taxable
income
that
all
of
such
dividend
income
be
added
if
any
is
added
at
all.
The
appeal
is
dismissed
with
costs,
if
demanded.