Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Dear Sirs:
Re: Part I.3 of theIncome Tax Act(the “Act”)
We are responding to your letter of October 26, 1990 in which you requested our interpretation of the treatment of leases for the purpose of calculating the Large Corporation Tax (“LCT”).
Paragraph 181.2(3)(f) of the Act provides for an exclusion in calculating taxable capital of “... any indebtedness in respect of a lease”. Where the form of an agreement between two parties reflects their true intention to enter into a lease, and not some other form of financing, such as a loan, it is our opinion that the indebtedness in respect of such a lease will fall within the bracketed exclusion in paragraph 181.2(3)(f) of the Act.
In response to your specific questions, our opinions are as follows:
- a) Is indebtedness related to a so-called capital lease excluded from the taxable capital of the lessee?
The terminology “capital and operating leases” are derived primarily from generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). In our opinion, the characterization of an agreement using GAAP, while perhaps relevant, is not determinative for the purpose of determining if an agreement is a lease or not. If the legal effects do not create a lessee/lessor relationship, even though the agreement may, for GAAP purposes, be considered a capital lease, there will be no exclusion in calculating taxable capital.
- b) Will a lessor be entitled to the investment allowance in respect of an asset which is the subject matter of a lease?
It is our view that if a contract creates a loan or advance, or an obligation described in subparagraph 181.2(4)(c), the contract is not a lease but a form of financing eligible for inclusion in the calculation of the investment allowance. In such a situation, the other party to the contract would be required to include the indebtedness in its taxable capital, even though the contract may be labelled a lease. Conversely, if a lease exists in law, it is our view that the asset held by the lessor would not fall within the enumerated categories of debt in paragraph 181.2(4) of the Act and therefore would not be eligible for the investment allowance.
While we trust the foregoing comments are of assistance, they do not constitute an advance income tax ruling and, therefore, are not binding on the Department.
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1990
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 1990
Email this Content