Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
B.C. Tax Conference of the Canadian Tax Foundation - Question 33 - Acquisition of Control
Question
Revenue Canada has commented at various time as to the meaning of the expression "acquisition of control by a person or group of persons" with subsections 111(4) and 111(5). However, Revenue Canada has to date provided only general tests as to what constitutes a controlling group, i.e. what facts indicate that shareholders have a "common link or interest" or "act together to control a corporation". Has there been any expansion or refinement of Revenue Canada's general tests as to what constitutes a "common link or interest" or "acting together", especially with respect to the interrelationship between shareholders of small, close-held corporations? Further, please comment on whether control would be considered to be acquired by a "group" of persons for the purposes of subsections 111(4) and (5) in the following situations:
- (a) If an arm's-length lender acquires shares of a XXX for the purpose of securing a loan, when would the lender be considered to be part of a "group" controlling the corporation?
- (b) If the members of a management group, no one of which owns more than, say, 10% of the shares of the corporation, deal with each other at arm's length but have a "common interest" to make a profit on operations of the corporation, would these individuals constitute a "group" which has acquired control of the corporation?
- (c) If there are two arm's-length shareholders of a corporation, each of whom owns 50% of the shares of a corporation, and a third arm's-length shareholder acquires shares of the corporation so that all three own a 1/3 interest, and the shareholders enter into a shareholder agreement setting out how the respective shares are to be voted, has control of the corporation been acquired by a "group" or persons? Is the existence of a shareholder agreement enough to prima facie satisfy the "acting together" test or is more required?
- (d) A Co and B Co are two arm's-length corporate shareholders of Opco, each of whom owns 50% of the shares of Opco. Control B Co acquired by C Co. Would control of Opco be acquired by a "group" of persons?
- (e) Can a person be a member of a "group" controlling a corporation if that individual owns no shares of the corporation? What if the person owns only non-voting (i.e. preference) shares?
Response
There has been no expansion or refinement of the department's position, as set out in our responses to question 42 at the 1984 Round Table and questions 40 and 43 at the 1988 Round Table.
In response to your specific questions:
- (a) Whether the lender would be considered to be part of a group that controls the corporation would depend on the circumstances of the particular situation, including the percentage of shares owned by the lender, who the other shareholders are, the relationship between the lender and the other shareholders, etc.
- (b) In determining whether a number of individuals that make up the management of a corporation constitute a group that controls the corporation, there must exist a common interest between them, which must involve more than their mere status as shareholders.
- (c) In our view, the existence of a shareholder agreement would not always be prima facie evidence that the shareholders that are party to the agreement constitute a group. Where the parties to the agreement constitute a group that controls the corporation would depend upon the terms of the agreement and any other relevant factors.
- (d) If A Co and C Co act in concert to control Opco, they would be considered to be a group of persons that had acquired control of Opco.
- (e) Yes, a person can be a member of a group that controls a corporation if that individual owns no shares of the corporation because, in our view, control could be indirect. For instance the individual could own shares of a corporation that owned shares of the corporation in question.
In our view, if a person owns only non-voting shares of a corporation, he would ordinarily not be a member of a group that controls the corporation. However, this determination would depend upon all of the circumstances, including for example, any special rights or privileges attaching to the non-voting shares, such as a right of conversion or exchange.
The above comments deal with control for purposes of subsection 111(4) and (5), and not with extended concepts of control such as those in subsections 251(5) or 256(5.1).
Response prepared by L.A. McCarron-McGuire (originally responded to as file 7-911251 in May 1991, in response to question 16 of the B.C. Tax Study Group Round Table)
August, 1991
File 5-912395
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1991
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 1991
Email this Content